tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3129355235412462878.post627896107144518165..comments2024-03-27T06:15:29.495-07:00Comments on Python Does What?!?: collections.deque random access is O(n)Kurt Rosehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11161604109056835253noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3129355235412462878.post-79072324017782559782022-03-15T05:21:48.395-07:002022-03-15T05:21:48.395-07:00Extra hold assets on UK air terminal pausing and a...Extra hold assets on UK air terminal pausing and air terminal lodgings with our markdown <a href="https://www.voucherpro.co.uk/saucony.com" rel="nofollow">Saucony Discount Code</a>. These vouchers are on top of our standard locale rate hypothesis saves.<br />Jennifer Anistonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04602975059122293884noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3129355235412462878.post-56243670179984143272017-04-12T17:54:54.237-07:002017-04-12T17:54:54.237-07:00timeit.timeit() by default runs the code 100,000 t...timeit.timeit() by default runs the code 100,000 times in a loop :-)<br /><br />Although the difference between 0.14 and 56 is very large, in absolute terms the duration of both operations is way below what we would perceive as instantaneous.Kurt Rosehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11161604109056835253noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3129355235412462878.post-71234982735394740172017-03-21T04:52:41.287-07:002017-03-21T04:52:41.287-07:00It's strange, right? If you call directly de[p...It's strange, right? If you call directly de[pos] without timeit or lambda, then it doesn't take 56 s.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06518721760477878007noreply@blogger.com